Self presentation and deception in online dating
Please refer to this blog post for more information. A typology and review.
Beauty is more than skin deep: Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Journal of Marketing, 51, 98 - Results indicated that, compared to baseline measures, male participants increased the amount they self-presented when anticipating a future interaction with a prospective date.
Toma and Jeffrey T.
Article first published online: Psychological Bulletin, 91, 3 - Guadagno a Bradley M. Communication Theory, 6, - Mating strategies of young women: Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes.
The importance to males and females of physical attractiveness, earning potential, and expressiveness in initial attraction. An evolutionary perspective on human mating. The evolution of human intrasexual competition: The accuracy of online dating photographs.
Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, - Retrieved January 22,from http: A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 2.
Sex Roles, 21, - How do communication and technology researchers study the Internet? Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, - Journal of Communication, 59, - Results are discussed in terms of a evolutionary theories about the importance of physical attractiveness in the dating realm and b the technological affordances that allow online daters to engage in selective self-presentation.
The evolution of human physical attractiveness. Organization Science15, -
- Can you hook up with your friends ex
- What are the four main principles of relative age dating
- Dating service san antonio
- Im dating someone else
- Dating deal breakers for guys
- The sims 3 online dating mod
- Sinopsis dating agency cyrano ep 9
- Special forces dating sites
- Dating zealand
- Pakistani dating new york
- Dating site passwords stolen
- Dating culture in scotland
- Fat dating site uk
- Free gay online dating